§100.13. Expanded academic support
A. Each school year, each student in grades kindergarten through five who failed to
achieve mastery on any statewide assessment administered pursuant to the state's school and
district accountability system in reading or math in the previous academic year or performed
below grade level on a literacy or numeracy screener in the current academic year shall be
provided expanded academic support as provided in this Section.
B. Each city, parish, or other local public school board shall develop a plan and
supporting budget to provide expanded academic support to students identified pursuant to
Subsection A of this Section. The plan shall be submitted to the state Department of
Education not later than September fifteenth of each year for review and approval.
C. The department shall review each plan submitted for compliance with applicable
federal and state regulations. The department shall provide feedback to the local board if
necessary to bring the plan into compliance with applicable regulations.
D. Each student identified in need of expanded academic support shall be provided
one of the following options:
(1) Prioritized placement in a class taught by a teacher labeled as "highly effective"
pursuant to the state's teacher evaluation system, if a highly effective teacher is available in
the school.
(2) High-dosage tutoring to commence no later than thirty days after the student is
identified in need of expanded academic support.
E. High-dosage tutoring provided pursuant to this Section shall meet all of the
following criteria:
(1) Incorporate direct instruction by tutors using formative assessments aligned with
grade-level content and Tier 1 classroom instruction.
(2) Be sustained for a minimum of ten weeks.
(3) Be provided at least three times per week, in approximately thirty-minute
sessions, which shall be embedded in the school day.
(4) Use assessments throughout the school year to monitor student progress.
(5) Be based on high-quality instructional materials that are aligned with state
content standards and that are specifically designed for supplemental instruction.
(6) Be individualized and provided at a ratio not higher than four students to one
tutor.
(7) Be provided by a high-quality tutor.
(8) Be provided by a consistent tutor or by a limited, consistent set of tutors
throughout the student's supplemental instruction period.
(9) Be provided in accordance with guidelines on research-based best practices and
effective accelerated instruction strategies developed and provided by the state Department
of Education.
F. For purposes of this Section, the following terms shall have the following
meanings:
(1) "Dosage" means the total duration of tutoring, in hours, and the total number of
tutoring sessions that a student receives in an academic year.
(2) "High-quality instructional materials" means materials that meet all of the
following criteria:
(a) Are included on the state Department of Education's approved curriculum list,
including materials created or provided by the department.
(b) Use instructional resources and formative assessments fully aligned to
Louisiana's grade-level content standards for what students should know and be able to do
at the end of each school year.
(c) Provide guidance and support for program implementation.
(d) Include a high level of student and teacher interaction.
(e) Are designed to devote the large majority of time to the major work of the grade
or course.
(f) Help students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency,
and application.
(g) Make meaningful and purposeful connections that promote focus and coherence
by connecting practice standards with content that is emphasized in the standards.
(h) Offer assessment opportunities that measure progress and elicit direct, observable
evidence of the degree to which students can independently demonstrate the assessed
grade-specific content standards.
(3) "High-quality tutor" means an individual who meets at least one of the following
criteria:
(a) A person with training in using high-quality instructional materials and who
receives ongoing oversight while providing the high-dosage tutoring.
(b) Staff of a high-quality tutoring provider.
(c) Current or retired teachers.
(d) Trained paraprofessionals.
G.(1) For the purpose of providing high-dosage tutoring, the state Department of
Education shall publish on its website a list of approved high-quality tutoring providers.
(2) In approving high-quality tutoring providers, the department shall require the
tutoring providers to:
(a) Use high-quality instructional materials that are aligned with research on effective
teaching and learning and state content standards.
(b) Implement high-dosage tutoring practices pursuant to this Section.
(c) Utilize diagnostic or assessment data to guide instruction.
(d) Use high-quality tutors who have passed background checks required of school
employees.
(e) Offer tutoring through in-person services or video conferences, or both.
(f) Provide evidence of impact on student outcomes disaggregated by student groups
according to race, gender, ethnicity, economically disadvantaged students, English language
learner status, disability status, and geographic location. Tutoring providers may demonstrate
impact through either adherence to the program's model design by aligning with the
components of high-dosage tutoring or by having evidence of positive and statistically
significant gains in student learning outcomes based on a well-designed randomized
controlled trial or quasi-experimental design that provides the basis for evidence of causal
program impact and which is conducted by an external third-party researcher.
(g) Serve a population of students in grades kindergarten through five and offer
tutoring in math or reading and literacy.
(h) Demonstrate tutor experience and content expertise.
(i) Establish per-student costs.
(j) Specify whether available tutoring models are in-person, virtual, or hybrid and
the geographic regions where services can be provided.
(3) Approved providers listed by the department shall be exempt from the state
procurement laws.
H. Within fifteen calendar days of a student being enrolled in high-dosage tutoring,
the parent shall be provided a written plan detailing the high-dosage tutoring that will be
provided, including information on who will provide the instruction and when the instruction
will be provided. The plan shall include specific dates for progress reports and information
on the parent's role in accelerating the student's learning. The information shall be provided
in a way that is accessible to the student's parent or legal guardian.
I.(1) Each city, parish, or other local public school board shall provide a report by
June first of each year to the state Department of Education on the following data regarding
eligible and participating students:
(a) The number of individual students identified as needing expanded academic
support and related student metrics including tutoring subject, grade level, prior performance
on the state assessment, and demographic information.
(b) The number of individual students provided each type of expanded academic
support and related student metrics including tutoring subject, grade level, attendance,
dosage, prior performance on the state assessment, and demographic information.
(c) The number of individual students who failed to achieve mastery on any
statewide assessment administered pursuant to the state's school and district accountability
system or performed below grade level on a literacy or numeracy screener during each school
year and who continue to need additional academic support and related student metrics
including tutoring subject, grade level, attendance, dosage, prior performance on the state
assessment, and demographic information.
(d) A list of the high-quality tutoring providers and any teachers used by the local
board to offer the expanded academic supports.
(e) A summary of how the school day has been restructured to offer the expanded
academic supports.
(f) The amount and source of private, federal, state, or local funds spent on providing
expanded academic supports and how funding was used by the local education agency to
provide high-dosage tutoring.
(2) By July first of each year, the department shall publish the following report on
its website:
(a) A summary of the information required by Paragraph (1) of this Subsection
reported by each school, each school system, and aggregate of all schools statewide,
including:
(i) How data required under this Paragraph has changed over time.
(ii) The number of students who received high-dosage tutoring.
(iii) The dosage and attendance of students who received high-dosage tutoring in the
program.
(iv) The number of students eligible for high-dosage tutoring.
(b) Data on achievement and growth outcomes from participating students.
(c) Program successes and challenges.
(d) Recommendations for policy changes in future years in order to ensure that every
child in Louisiana can access high-dosage tutoring as needed.
(e) An overview of actions taken to support every local education agency to ensure
that high-dosage tutoring is available to every eligible child in Louisiana.
J. The department shall create reporting templates, procedures, and definitions for
reporting metrics for city, parish, and other local public school boards to use in collecting and
reporting tutoring-related data to the department including changes in academic performance
of participating students disaggregated by student groups according to race, gender, ethnicity,
economically disadvantaged students, English language learner status, disability status, and
geographic location. To the extent possible, the department shall leverage existing reporting
processes and systems to reduce the reporting burden on local education agencies and public
charter schools.
K. The department shall provide training, technical assistance, and guidance,
including but not limited to the topic of sustaining high-dosage tutoring through existing
funding streams, to city, parish, and other local public school boards conducting in-school
high-dosage tutoring with a priority focus on effective schedule management.
L. The determination of whether students are in need of additional expanded
academic support shall not be used in evaluating teacher performance or determining school
or district accountability scores and letter grades.
M. Local school boards shall utilize available state and federal funds to implement
the provisions of this Section. If such funding is not available, a local school board shall not
be obligated to provide funding to continue the expanded academic support provided for in
this Section.
Acts 2021, No. 294, §1; Acts 2023, No. 458, §1; Acts 2024, No. 771, §1.